ProspeKtive

Beyond the coffee machine: how to team up despite the distance?

January 2022

Expert

Suzy Canivenc

Doctor from Rennes 2 University

Teacher-researcher in communication and management

Associate researcher at Mines Paris-Tech-Futures of Industry and Labor Chair

The Covid crisis never ends and continues to question working groups. Despite several months of forced experimentation with telework, many questions remain, in particular those relating to the preservation of the collective despite the distance. And if this question required reviewing certain well-established prejudices forged by decades of work on site? Such is the ambition of the book written by the Futures of Industry and Labor Chair of Mines Paris Tech: Is remote work shaping the future of work?

Is collective work possible remotely?

Our habit of working 100% on site seems to make us mistakenly confuse co-presence and cooperation. That's according to a 2009 study of 80 software development teams in 28 labs around the world[1]. She revealed that teams located in the same building but on different floors could perform less well than teams dispersed over the same city, country or continent. For a simple reason: the former tend to underestimate the obstacles to communication and collaboration, whereas the latter are much more attentive to them and work to structure their organizational processes (organization and monitoring of tasks, formal communication) and socio-emotional (mutual aid and cohesion, informal communication).

Thus, the physical co-presence in the same room, even equipped with a coffee machine, does not in any way ensure the cooperation of individuals. The latter requires thoughtful organizational work that is not satisfied with the magical powers attributed to spatial proximity.

 

Can the work collective stay at a distance?

In the same spirit, physical proximity has little to do with relational proximity and social connection. The latter feed above all on a common identity and shared references at the social and cognitive level.

Research in the human sciences initiated the shift in the 1970s, a time when we witnessed "a questioning of the classic conceptions of social groups necessarily implying co-presence and spatial proximity between members" in favor of a conception " sociocognitive of the group”[2]. Thus, being close physically does not necessarily imply being close emotionally. An execrable neighbor on the landing (or office) is good proof of this! In this regard, remote work also seems to allow some employees to escape conflictual[3] situations and reduce differences[4] with their colleagues.

A survey carried out following the first confinement revealed that 72% of French employees questioned believed that their relations with their colleagues had improved.[5].

*****

So many studies that encourage us to review some of our conceptions of collective work and social ties in business. As we can see, this research is far from new and it is high time to draw the necessary conclusions. The organization of remote work, and in its wake that of hybrid work, requires reviewing our organizational and managerial concepts. Undoubtedly, research in the humanities and social sciences can help leaders and managers in their thinking.



[1]Étude Vanson Bourne pour Vmware, « The New Remote Work Era : Trends in the Distributed Workforce », 2020. https://fr.insight.com/content/dam/insight-web/fr_FR/images/2020/10/655785_WW_21Q3_GLB_CONTSYND_MULTI_CTA_DW_FRW_ENGLISH_REG_20220918_UPDATED.pdf . Enquête menée auprès de 5700 responsables RH, informatiques et dirigeants dans 12 pays (Allemagne, Arabie Saoudite, Émirats Arabes Unis, Espagne, France, Italie, Norvège, Pays-bas, Russie, Pologne, Royaume-Uni, Suède) de juin à juillet 2020.

[2]SIEDBRAT F., HOEGL M., ERNST, H. (2009), « How to manage virutal team », MIT Sloan Management Review, 1er juillet 2009. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-manage-virtual-teams/

[3]MICHINOV, E. (2008), « La distance physique et ses effets dans les équipes de travail distribuées : une analyse psychosociale », Le travail humain, vol. 71, no 1, pp. 1-21. https://www.cairn.info/revue-le-travail-humain-2008-1-page-1.htm

[4]DIARD, C., HACHARD, V. (2021), « Mise en œuvre du télétravail : une relation managériale réinventée ? ». Annales des Mines - Gérer et comprendre, vol. 144, no 2, pp. 38-52. https://www.cairn.info/revue-gerer-et-comprendre-2021-2-page-38.htm

[5]ROSANVALLON, J (2006), « Travail à distance et représentations du collectifs de travail ». Revue Interventions Économiques, 2006, vol. 34. https://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/706

Release date: January 2022

Read more

The constructions of tomorrow must be sustainable and recyclable

Contact - David Habrias

David Habrias

Managing Partner
Head of the Architecture Division

+33 5 61 53 76 02

dhabrias@kardham.com

Sylvie Simon Elia

Sylvie Simon Elia

Director of the Engineering Division

+33 6 07 72 44 16

ssimonelia@kardham.com

The office of tomorrow? It's not win !

Roman Coste

Roman Coste

Managing Partner

+33 6 09 65 60 34

rcoste@kardham.com